www.4gwirelessjobs.com
Wireless Careers Worldwide
4G Wireless Evolution
VAS Jobs
Chintan Patel
Chintan Patel has 13 article(s) online.
Contact Contact Author
Mail Mail to friend
Print Print Article
Contact Publish Article


Wireless from AT&T

Great Deals on Apple Notebooks! + FREE Shipping
UMTS Jobs
Home » Technology » 4G: WiMAX, LTE » WiMAX versus LTE battle: A myth?
Vote: (2)
Bookmark and Share

WiMAX versus LTE battle: A myth?

Posted On: 2010-01-24 21:12:57 / Comments: 2 / Views: 1626 Posted By: Chintan Patel
There had always been speculations about the competing wireless technologies in the past, such as GSM versus CDMA. In this battle the scenario was different, where both the technolgies had a completely different interface for their operation, but CDMA proved to be far beyond GSM considering the number of subscribers in the market. It was also said that CDMA performs better than the GSM based interface. Every upcoming technology wants to surpass its competitor in some way or the other. At present, a similar scenario is observed with WiMAX and LTE. WiMAX deploying companies are in a rush to establish their very high-speed IP-based technology worldwide before LTE begins to mark its presence in the market.

WiMAX is being deployed at a steady pace worldwide and will try to grab major customers in the market. One must not forget the fact that in the U.S., North America's two leading wireless providers, namely, AT&T and Verizon Wireless has been roped to provide LTE services in U.S. And one must also not forget that Clearwire and other major vendors of WiMAX have already developed WiMAX base stations and is far beyond LTE deployment at present.

WiMAX would provide backhaul to the large customers and LTE may be roped in to provide access to them after 5 to 10 years down the lane. Originally WiMAX was being designed as a backhaul technology which may prove this technology to be a strong backhaul service provider. Neither of the technologies would displace eachother as the customers will have a choice of selecting the best option viable to them by considering the most reliable service provider, which is bound to be diversified within the masses.

Since Wi-Fi cannot be replaced totally by either WiMAX or LTE due to its vast recognition and usage by customers, it does not seem that LTE or WiMAX would compete thoroughly with each other, but rather be dependent on each other to provide valuable and high-speed services to their consumers with effect to their strengths and advantages. 


Source: Why the WiMAX Vs. LTE isn't a battle?
http://www.wimax.com/commentary/blog/blog-2009/september-2009/why-the-wimax-vs-lte-battle-isnt-a-battle-0909
 
 
About the Author: Chintan Patel
Currently pursuing Masters of Science in Telecommunications Management at Stevens Institute of Technology located in Hoboken, New Jersey.

The world of wireless technologies and networking has always been the epicenter of my interests. Looking upto the emerging technologies has inspired me to explore areas in the wireless and networking environment. I have prepared technical papers at a graduate level and worked on projects in the fields of my interest which include LTE, WiMAX, Wireless security systems etc.

I am a hardworking individual who is willing to learn everyday, which also helps in improving my strengths with the course of time and truly believe in doing all my work with dedication and perfection.

Article source: http://www.4gwirelessjobs.com/articles/article-detail.php?WiMAX versus LTE battle: A myth?&Arid=OTU=&Auid=NjM=
Article tags: WiMAX, LTE, backhaul, Wi-Fi
Comments by Author

Comments

1. JoeWargo (2010-04-19 09:53:38)
The one problem we see is the lack of coordination with WiMax frequency. Each operator is deploying their own licensed frequency and calling it WiMax because it meets the conditions of OFDM and MIMO. This eliminates the idea of interoperability with various manufactures equipment. The 3.65GHz spectrum that the FCC has allowed is far to narrow of band for mass deployments.
2. Chintan Patel (2010-04-19 11:44:44)
You may be right Joe. There have been speculations with usage of spectrum for WiMAX and every operator wants to deploy the same to meet the conditions of OFDM and MIMO. Also, most of the small or medium type of service providers target at the unlicensed bands first, which seems to be overcrowded and would definately affect the working under those bands.

As you mentioned about the 3.65 GHz spectrum, FCC has brought a solution between unlicensed and licensed band conditions. As per my knowledge, the 3.65 GHz is a medium regulated spectrum band, by which the service providers need to pay for the registration and some subscribed fee.

Also, the 3.5 GHz is the spectrum that is widely used international, but it is subject to restrictions in the U.S, since 3.5 GHz is used for military operations. As the spectrum is limited and with advanced technologies making thier way into the industry, FCC must come with a solution so as to serve better with WiMAX making its mark at present.

Thank you for yor response Joe. I am thoroughly looking forward to hear from you soon.
Add A Comment * fields are compulsory
Name * E-mail / User Id *
Comment * Access code *
Access Code
This site does not allow anonymous comments. Registered members can submit their comments any time.
Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Wireless from AT&T
WIMAX Jobs
  Become a fan Acceptance Mark [Valid RSS]